Secure.gov websites use HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// means you have actually securely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive info only on authorities, protected websites.

- About - The Attorney General

• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About About
  
  Our Work
  
  - Contact the Division Contact the Division
  
  Report a Violation
  
  - Cases and Matters
• Press Room Press Room
  
  Videos
  
  Publications
  
  - Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
  
  Experienced Professionals
  
  Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
  
  Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
  
  - Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
  
  Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
  
  - En español
  
  - About - title=" About" About
• The Attorney general of the United States
• Organizational Chart
• Budget & Performance
• History
• Privacy Program
  
  - title=" News" News
• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos
• Photo Galleries
• Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
• Guidance Documents
• Forms
• Publications
• Information for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice?
• Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies - Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Help - Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Civil Liberty Division
• The Fair Housing Act
  
  The Fair Housing Act
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., forbids discrimination by direct suppliers of housing, such as proprietors and real estate business as well as other entities, such as towns, banks or other loaning organizations and house owners insurer whose prejudiced practices make housing not available to persons since of:
  
  race or color. religion. sex. nationwide origin. familial status, or. impairment.
  
  In cases including discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might submit suit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is proof of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of public value. Where force or threat of force is utilized to reject or interfere with reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice might set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise supplies procedures for handling individual grievances of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have actually been victims of an unlawful housing practice, might submit a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of people based upon referrals from HUD.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
  
  Among the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing companies attempt to disguise their discrimination by giving about availability of housing, either stating that nothing was offered or steering homeseekers to certain locations based upon race. Individuals who get such false information or misdirection may have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of cases declaring this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to reveal this kind of covert discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have actually alleged discrimination based on race or color. A few of the Department's cases have likewise declared that municipalities and other local government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied permits or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to predominantly minority areas, because the potential residents were expected to be predominantly African-Americans.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
  
  The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of obvious discrimination against members of a particular religion too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to limit making use of private homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases submitted considering that 1968 declaring spiritual discrimination is little in comparison to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does contain a restricted exception that enables non-commercial housing operated by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the same religious beliefs.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
  
  The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this area has actually been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, particularly those who are poor, and with minimal housing alternatives, frequently have little recourse however to endure the embarrassment and destruction of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their households and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is targeted at property managers who create an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we look for both to obtain relief for tenants who have actually been treated unjustly by a property owner since of sex and also deter other potential abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with effects. In addition, rates discrimination in mortgage loaning may likewise adversely affect females, particularly minority ladies. This kind of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of a person's birth or where his or her forefathers originated. Census information show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing sector of our nation's population. The Justice Department has taken enforcement action versus community federal governments that have attempted to minimize or restrict the number of Hispanic households that may live in their communities. We have actually sued lending institutions under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have actually enforced more rigid underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic debtors. The Department has also taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the country have experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have taken action versus private landlords who have victimized such individuals.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
  
  The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus households with kids under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out denial of housing to families with children, the Act also prevents housing companies from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on renters with custody of children. For example, landlords might not find households with kids in any single portion of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the total number of individuals who might live in a residence, or restrict their access to leisure services offered to other renters. In many circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing service provider from declining to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some facilities may be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This type of housing, which fulfills the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published guidelines and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
  
  The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination on the basis of impairment in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act specifies individuals with a special needs to indicate those individuals with psychological or physical disabilities that substantially limit one or more major life activities. The term mental or physical impairment might consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing problems, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, chronic fatigue, learning disability, head injury, and psychological disease. The term major life activity might consist of seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, caring for one's self, finding out, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act likewise secures persons who have a record of such a problems, or are concerned as having such a problems. Current users of illegal illegal drugs, persons founded guilty for illegal manufacture or distribution of a controlled compound, sex offenders, and juvenile wrongdoers are not thought about handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act pays for no protections to people with or without specials needs who present a direct danger to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct hazard should be made on a personalized basis, however, and can not be based upon basic assumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's securities for individuals with disabilities has concentrated on two significant areas. One is guaranteeing that zoning and other policies worrying land use are not used to prevent the domestic options of these individuals, consisting of unnecessarily limiting communal, or gather, residential plans, such as group homes. The second location is guaranteeing that newly built multifamily housing is developed in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's ease of access requirements so that it is accessible to and functional by people with specials needs, and, in particular, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that restrict discrimination against individuals with impairments, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division.
  ca.gov
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
  usa.gov
  Some people with impairments may cohabit in congregate living arrangements, frequently described as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids municipalities and other local government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or carrying out land use policies that leave out or otherwise discriminate versus people with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
  
  - To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be a regulation prohibiting housing for individuals with specials needs or a particular kind of special needs, such as mental illness, from locating in a specific location, while allowing other groups of unassociated individuals to cohabit in that area.
• To take action versus, or reject a license, for a home due to the fact that of the disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a building authorization for a home since it was meant to supply housing for persons with mental retardation.
• To refuse to make sensible lodgings in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be needed to afford persons or groups of individuals with specials needs an equal opportunity to use and enjoy housing. What makes up a sensible accommodation is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested modifications of guidelines or policies are sensible. If a requested modification enforces an excessive financial or administrative concern on a city government, or if an adjustment develops a fundamental change in a regional federal government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "reasonable" lodging.
  
  Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
  
  The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus persons with specials needs to include a failure "to create and build" particular brand-new multi-family houses so that they are accessible to and functional by individuals with impairments, and particularly people who use wheelchairs. The Act requires all recently constructed multi-family dwellings of 4 or more systems meant for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific features: an accessible entrance on an available path, accessible common and public usage areas, doors adequately large to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible paths into and through each house, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible place, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and usable bathroom and kitchens configured so that a wheelchair can navigate about the area.
  
  Developers, contractors, owners, and designers accountable for the design or construction of new multi-family housing may be held liable under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to fulfill these style requirements. The Department of Justice has brought lots of enforcement actions against those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have actually been solved by permission decrees providing a range of types of relief, consisting of: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other building requirements) that will supply for making other housing units available